In March 2010, IEC 62366:2007, “Medical Devices–Application
of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices,” went into effect, and compliance
to this standard is now required by the European regulatory bodies. Compliance
to the standard’s predecessor, ANSI/AAMI HE74:2001, “Human Factors Design
Process for Medical Devices,” has been required by the FDA for more than ten
years. Both documents state that medical device manufacturers must demonstrate
that all potential use-related hazards in their devices have been identified,
tested, and mitigated.
Differentiating Between Validation Testing and Other Usability Testing
November 8, 2011 by
Effectively Communicating Usability Problems
November 8, 2011 by
Little attention has been given to the way in which
usability results— the actual categorization and measurement of the problems
discovered through an array of usability evaluations— are communicated. Common
practice indicates that most usability practitioners organize the usability
results they identify by (1) category or attribute of a problem and (2)
severity. Unfortunately, there is little agreement among practitioners on which
list of categories is the most comprehensive and which severity scale is the
most appropriate. The most common response, of course, remains “it depends.”
Continuous Improvement through Continuous Motion
November 8, 2011 by
As designers envision more complex, functional products, and
manufacturers increase production speeds, the engineers in charge of the next
step—assembly—need to step up their game, as well. Part of any continuous
improvement initiative involving assembly should take a look at continuous
motion technology.
Injection Mold Design | The Valve Gate Assembly
October 13, 2011 by
Article From: MoldMaking Technology, Bill Smith, Originally posted on: 2/1/2005
Injection Mold Design
Valve gated hot runner installationValve gate installations must be made to manufacturer specs to obtain the advantages necessary for competitive production of injection molded parts in today’s marketplace.
In today’s world of injection mold products, decisions on injection mold design and construction are often driven by initial price and delivery. This manner of injection mold acquisition can place the injection mold part in a position of not being at its long-term economic advantage for the company producing the first generation of parts, and not contributing a fair share to the bottom line profits for even short-run molds.
When a new generation of the same basic part is produced, molders often modify the existing tooling under the assumption that the procedure will keep production so well off economically, that competition will not get the new contract. On the contrary, a competitor with injection mold designed for long-term parts production, at the best ROI against the production run, will have an economic edge in rebidding, particularly if the same procedures are reflective of the total corporate outlook.
Injection Mold Design | Factors to Consider When Choosing a System
Following are points to consider for both short-run and long-run injection molded plastic parts.
When considering the gating system to be used in an injection mold, all of the facets of an economic injection mold operation must be considered: initial total injection mold cost, injection mold trial cost, setup time, cycle time, maintenance, scrap, secondary operations, auxiliary equipment and part quality.
In the construction of a cold bushing, single-cavity mold with edge-gating of the part, added injection mold size is required to accommodate the runner and offset of the cavity from the sprue bushing. Well-designed systems will provide a low profile hot runner to move the resin to the offset for edge-gating with the least increase in injection mold size.
Reduced Injection Mold Size Offsets Hot Runner Costs
The reduced injection mold size alone often offsets the hot runner’s initial cost and can permit the use of a press size to match the part requirements. By using a valve gate to the parting line, less resin is required per shot, which saves energy and reduces scrap (sprues) or the percentage of regrind used.
The economies of using a hot runner to replace mold offset are such that they should be considered for all parts above 50g with an expected production life above 150,000 parts. The larger the part, the lower the total number of parts may be due to the expensive injection mold base needed for a cold runner system, but with very low increases in the hot runner cost.
Advantages of Using a Sprue Bushing
The use of a sprue bushing to directly gate into a single-cavity mold provides several advantages in the construction and operation of the mold over the cold runner type. The injection mold base size is only dependent on the part requirements and will use the smallest press needed.
When using a cold sprue bushing, a sprue is created that must be removed, leaving a mark, which often must be removed by secondary operations if appearance or maximum height of the sprue remainder are part considerations. To prevent this, a hot sprue bushing is used, which often leaves an unacceptable mark, reduces the operating window and raises the level of internal part stress (warpage).
Use of a valve gate system will not produce a sprue, will reduce unacceptable marks, and maintain a good operating window while providing a part with the least possible stress. Most valve gate systems require a larger mold—both in the mold base footprint and height—since they must use a hot runner manifold to offset the valve gate operating system from mold centerline and must fit a manifold and the operating mechanism in the injection mold. Better designed systems will accomplish this with no increase in mold base footprint, and often without an increase in mold height because the valve gate is on the centerline of the injection mold and does not use an external operating mechanism.
Cold Runner System Dictates Larger Injection Mold Sizes
When designing molds of multicavity layout using cold runner systems, the mold size often is increased to accommodate the runner, slides and mechanisms—and the cavity is more difficult to orientate for complex part shapes. The injection molding process operating window becomes very restricted and warpage control is dependent on part modification or long process times.
Three-plate mold construction is sometimes used to permit higher levels of cavitation, better cavity layout and automatic mold operation. Using a hot runner system with direct thermal gating in place of the traditional mold constructions will permit the utilization of the multicavity mold in a more economical form—smallest parting line surface per part, low mold height, better cycle time, least scrap and best automatic function.
Using a traditional valve gated hot runner will provide additional advantages in cycle times, reduced part stress and higher quality parts. However, new valve gated hot runner systems that cause no mold height increase and are less expensive can help alleviate the initial cost and mold height increases of traditional valve gated hot runners that reduce economical effectiveness.
To provide better mold delivery times, the hot runner order may be for the entire “A” half minus cavities. This spreads the workload to a larger facilities base, which can reduce mold construction time.
Hot Runner System Reduces Cost, Time and Waste
When the above summaries are applied to the acquisition of molds, it should be apparent that a hot runner system can significantly reduce initial cost, tool construction time, and operating expenses of trials, setup, cycle time, maintenance, scrap and secondary operations—and with an efficient valve gate system—no additional equipment is necessary. The hot runner will provide the high consistency of part quality demanded by most applications.
Injection Mold designs using hot runner thermal gated systems and valve gate systems are often specified to provide the utmost in high-performance molding. They will produce very consistent shot-to-shot repeatability, faster cycle times, good automatic mold operation and better part quality.
A well-designed system of hot runner valve gates will normally out-perform other systems—both thermal and valve gate alike. Such a system uses less injection mold height, less power, and no external control or auxiliary power systems. The bottom line is that a hot runner system will provide overall advantages that should be explored in nearly any injection mold acquisition.
Valve gate installations should be made to the specs issued by their manufacturer to obtain the advantages necessary for competitive production of injection molded parts in today’s marketplace. The valve gate advantages over the thermal gate systems stem from the very straightforward, sturdy construction of all components, which is derived from a basic design concept of the least number of parts to provide the best gate flow/control situation.
To learn more about Injection Mold from Total Solution Plastic visit our website, or use our Contact Form to email us.
Franklin Spears
Total Solution Plastic
7613 Pats Branch Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-900-8801
Better Injection Mold Sourcing…Is It Worth The Trouble?
August 17, 2011 by
Better Injection Mold Sourcing
Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) have to be good at what they do to survive in the global economy. To achieve this goal many demand that their suppliers have state-of-the-art molding equipment and procedures. OEMs can purchase some of the world’s best plastic materials from American manufacturers. When it comes to buying molds, OEMs have shown a preference for low-cost over high quality. This is counterproductive, as world-class molding requires a state-of-the-art injection molds.
Low Cost Injection Mold from China
Manufacturers have been seeking low cost Injection Mold from China, India and many other low cost centers for some years now. China has put in the necessary infrastructure to support the injection mold building industry in the Shenzhen area. In spite of that fact, lower cost shops have opened in other areas like Shanghai, Dongguan in Guangdong, and Huangyan. Labor costs are lower and so is the skill of the workers. It is my professional opinion that no-one should ever gamble and go to areas beyond Shenzhen if they are seeking high level craftsmanship and an injection mold that will last as per SPI Standards.
OEMs and Molders receive spam email each day soliciting their injection mold business. Many of these emails come from minor shops of which reside in areas that are not well supported. As long as everything goes well, it may be ok… but when there are issues, these shops do not have the technical ability nor the financial where withal to support it. We often hear customers talking about how badly they were hurt by a China shop. When this is explored further, you find that many times they went to small, unsupported, financially unstable shops which presented to them a very attractive cost. The cost did not end up low…but very late and very expensive for the repairs. Total cost of acquisition can be deceiving.
Injection Mold Supplier – Total Solution Plastic
This is why it is extremely important to deal with Hybrid shops like Total Solution Plastic that has been to China, met the people and qualified the shop. Agreements are in place to support each other and ultimately our customer. This may cost a little more than going to the lower cost centers, but Quality Assurance, Financial Stability and Project Management is paramount when making such an important decision for your company.
Typically we see about 40% cost savings to our customers as compared to “domestic” prices as long as the mold has a substantial amount of labor involved. Simply, the larger the mold, the more action, the more the cost; you realize more savings. It really comes down to the cost of qualified labor and engineering support that can cost effectively produce your mold.
To learn more about Injection Mold from Total Solution Plastic visit our website, or use our Contact Form to email us.
Franklin Spears
Total Solution Plastic
7613 Pats Branch Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-900-8801
